AU - Redshaw, Jeffrey AU - Mobley, Elizabeth AU - Hopf, Harriet AU - Lowrance, William AU - Myers, Jeremy AU - Brant, William TI - Improved compliance with prophylactic antibiotic guidelines in urologic prosthetic surgery using a simple protocol: Should antimicrobial prophylaxis be administered exclusively in the operating room? PT - ORIG DP - 2014 Jul 1 TA - Journal of Integrative Nephrology and Andrology PG - 14-19 VI - 1 IP - 1 4099- http://www.journal-ina.com/article.asp?issn=2394-2916;year=2014;volume=1;issue=1;spage=14;epage=19;aulast=Redshaw;type=0 4100- http://www.journal-ina.com/article.asp?issn=2394-2916;year=2014;volume=1;issue=1;spage=14;epage=19;aulast=Redshaw AB - Context: Established guidelines advocate for the administration of antimicrobial prophylaxis (AMP) within 60 min of the surgical incision. An internal audit of genitourinary prosthetics at our institution revealed, we were compliant in only 25% of cases and led to the development of a standardized protocol emphasizing administration of AMP in the OR by the anesthesia provider and specific duties for each member of the surgical team (anesthesia, surgery, and nursing). Aims: The aim was to describe the system factors that we recognized as responsible and determine our protocols effect on compliance. Settings and Design: A retrospective review of urologic prosthetics cases performed by a single surgeon at our institution from October 2009 to January 2011 was conducted. Sixty consecutive cases occurring: Prior to the protocol, immediately after, and 18 months after it went into effect were reviewed. Statistical Analysis: Categorical data were compared using the Fisher's exact test and continuous variables using the Student's t-test at the P > 0.05 significance level. Results: System factors associated with noncompliance included: Location of antibiotic administration (OR vs. preoperative area) and timing of the case (first case vs. not). Ninety-six percent of noncompliance was the result of AMP being administered too early. Compliance increased from 25% to >91% and the proportion of AMP administered in the OR increased from 20% to >88%. No drop-off in compliance occurred 18 months after initiation of the protocol. Conclusion: A defined protocol in conjunction with shifting administration of AMP to the OR and into the hands of the anesthesia provider can achieve a durable increase in compliance with established guidelines.